spk-logo-tm-2023
0%
1-888-310-4540 (main) / 1-888-707-6150 (support) info@spkaa.com
Select Page

Why Software Builds Fail and Areas for Improvement

windchill features best plm software
Written by SPK Blog Post
Published on June 29, 2015

In a recently published paper, researchers at Google examined the issue of failed software builds within their organization. Specifically, they wanted to address the separate questions of “How often do builds fail?”, “Why do builds fail”, and “How long does it take to fix broken builds?” To answer these questions, the researchers looked at 26.6 million Java and C++ builds due to the overwhelming usage of these two languages within Google. For the purposes of this article, we will review the results of the question “why do builds fail?”

To determine why builds were failing, the researchers examined the build logs and categorized compiler error messages into different groups. Of the categories defined, the researchers looked at the top 25 most frequent error messages to identify the most common cause of build failure. The results indicated that only 10 percent of the error categories accounted for 90 percent of the broken builds, regardless of the language. Additionally, those errors where most commonly dependency related.

Insofar as these findings are generalizable to organizations outside of Google, the implications of this research suggest that dependency management is one of the most critical areas of concern for decreasing the amount of broken software builds. Potential actions could include reducing the dependencies for a given project, or developing assistive tools to help developers resolve dependency errors. Ideally, the goal should be to help prevent developers from submitting changes that contain dependency errors. In this study, the average resolution time was one to two additional builds. In this scenario, if we assume introducing a dependency-related bug requires two additional builds, the cost of such a bug is 3 times the elapsed build time in addition to the developer’s time required to resolve it.

Next Steps:

David Hubbell
Software Engineer
SPK and Associates

Latest White Papers

The Safe AI Governance Playbook

The Safe AI Governance Playbook

When it comes to AI, balancing safety and security with innovation is vital for peak efficiency. This eBook explores how to achieve success with AI governance.What You Will Learn In this eBook, you will discover: Why AI governance matters The role of AI governance...

Related Resources

The Hidden Cost of Disconnecting Requirements from Development

The Hidden Cost of Disconnecting Requirements from Development

Complex product development involves multi-disciplinary teams, with systems engineers or requirements analysts producing the requirements, and other disciplines creating designs and tests based on those requirements. Serious problems can arise if all teams do not have...

Achieving Regulatory Compliance through Connected ALM and PLM Systems

Achieving Regulatory Compliance through Connected ALM and PLM Systems

Compliance is not always about having the right documentation.  In regulated industries, compliance is about proving that requirements are defined, changes are controlled, risks are addressed, tests are completed, and approvals are captured in a traceable, audit-ready...

Meet the Experts: Ginna Kang

Meet the Experts: Ginna Kang

Ginna Khang is an Applications Engineer focused on research and development (R&D).  She started at SPK and Associates in 2022 as an intern while she attended UC Santa Cruz.  After graduating in 2024, she was brought on full-time.  Here is more about Ginna in her...