spk-logo-tm-2023
0%
1-888-310-4540 (main) / 1-888-707-6150 (support) info@spkaa.com
Select Page

Why Software Builds Fail and Areas for Improvement

windchill features best plm software
Written by SPK Blog Post
Published on June 29, 2015

In a recently published paper, researchers at Google examined the issue of failed software builds within their organization. Specifically, they wanted to address the separate questions of “How often do builds fail?”, “Why do builds fail”, and “How long does it take to fix broken builds?” To answer these questions, the researchers looked at 26.6 million Java and C++ builds due to the overwhelming usage of these two languages within Google. For the purposes of this article, we will review the results of the question “why do builds fail?”

To determine why builds were failing, the researchers examined the build logs and categorized compiler error messages into different groups. Of the categories defined, the researchers looked at the top 25 most frequent error messages to identify the most common cause of build failure. The results indicated that only 10 percent of the error categories accounted for 90 percent of the broken builds, regardless of the language. Additionally, those errors where most commonly dependency related.

Insofar as these findings are generalizable to organizations outside of Google, the implications of this research suggest that dependency management is one of the most critical areas of concern for decreasing the amount of broken software builds. Potential actions could include reducing the dependencies for a given project, or developing assistive tools to help developers resolve dependency errors. Ideally, the goal should be to help prevent developers from submitting changes that contain dependency errors. In this study, the average resolution time was one to two additional builds. In this scenario, if we assume introducing a dependency-related bug requires two additional builds, the cost of such a bug is 3 times the elapsed build time in addition to the developer’s time required to resolve it.

Next Steps:

David Hubbell
Software Engineer
SPK and Associates

Latest White Papers

SOLIDWORKS vs. Creo: A Comparison

SOLIDWORKS vs. Creo: A Comparison

Solidworks and Creo are both popular 3D CAD solutions, and for good reason. They both offer a wide range of capabilities, but which system works best for your team?What You Will Learn In this comparison of Solidworks and Creo, you will discover the differences between...

Related Resources

AI and the Future of DevSecOps: Turning Obstacles into Opportunities

AI and the Future of DevSecOps: Turning Obstacles into Opportunities

Software development teams are under constant pressure to deliver new features faster. Balancing this with maintaining strong security and compliance standards isn’t always easy.  Artificial intelligence is rapidly changing that.  AI-powered tools are helping...

Managing Automotive Software and Hardware Integration at Scale

Managing Automotive Software and Hardware Integration at Scale

Advanced driver assistance systems, connected vehicle services, and electrification platforms. What do all of these features have in common?  The answer: software.  As these features increasingly make their way into mainstream automotive development, vehicles are...