spk-logo-tm-2023
0%
1-888-310-4540 (main) / 1-888-707-6150 (support) info@spkaa.com
Select Page

Continuous Integration Best Practices—Part 1

Continuous Integration is a leading software development methodology whereby new development is constantly being submitted and tested against the main body of work. The goal being rapid feedback on incremental changes, resulting in lower maintenance costs and higher levels of code stability. The purpose of this article is to begin the process of examining the best practices associated with this particular development method.

There are approximately ten key principles, as outlined below:

  1. Maintain a code repository
  2. Automate the build
  3. Make the build self-testing
  4. Everyone commits to the baseline every day
  5. Every commit (to baseline) should be built
  6. Keep the build fast
  7. Test in a clone of the production environment
  8. Make it easy to get the latest deliverables
  9. Everyone can see the results of the latest build
  10. Automate deployment

To begin, we will be looking at the first three of the principles.

1) Maintain a code repository

Having a version control system to maintain your code history is pretty par for the course these days. At this point, the issue is not simply having a repository, it’s how that repository is accessed and maintained. CI, as an ideology, is pretty opinionated about this matter. According to CI, there needs to reside a single, central repository, from which all checkouts and testing is done and to which all commits are pushed. The rationale for this is maintaining one single source of truth at all times and avoiding instances where a change works in a development environment but not production. This being the case, branching is discouraged – at least in the sense that CI does not want you to maintain parallel version of your code.

2) Automate the Build

In a CI system, builds should happen automatically when a developer submits their code, and as much as possible, should be free of manual steps. This is a prerequisite for points 3, 5, 6, and 10. Not only is this point important for the speed of the build process (which is arguably the reason for doing CI in the first place), but it imposes a standard of consistency and repeatability that is vitally important for ensuring quality and tracking progress.

3) Make the Build Self-Testing

If a build requires manual testing, then the build will be slow and the chances of errors sneaking through will also increase. Ideally, CI would prefer that all tests are run with every build, but the reality of the situation is that this is frequently not practical. In many cases it makes more sense to run the tests pertinent to the affected modules, aggregate a set of changes and then run that aggregate set through the full complement of testing. Fewer tests means a faster test execution time and quicker feedback to the developer while submitting batches of aggregate changes conserves organizational resources.

David Hubbell
Software Engineer
SPK and Associates

Next Steps:

Latest White Papers

A Checklist for Reducing Time to Market in Engineering

A Checklist for Reducing Time to Market in Engineering

Product teams all have the same goal: produce high-quality products and reduce time to market. Achieving these goals simultaneously can be difficult, but your team doesn’t have to sacrifice one for the other. Learn how in this eBook.What You Will Learn In this eBook,...

Related Resources

Forward Deployed Engineers vs. Consultants: What’s the Difference?

Forward Deployed Engineers vs. Consultants: What’s the Difference?

Key Takeaways Consultants, professional services, and managed services serve different purposes. Consultants provide strategic guidance, professional services focus on implementation, and managed services support ongoing operations. Forward Deployed Engineers (FDEs)...

Replacing IBM DOORS: Which Path Is Right?

Replacing IBM DOORS: Which Path Is Right?

Legacy IBM DOORS remains a mature requirements management platform, particularly for complex and regulated engineering programs. It provides structured specifications, baselines, electronic signatures, change management, and multi-level traceability.  However,...

How Product Teams Can Measure AI Coding ROI

How Product Teams Can Measure AI Coding ROI

Key Takeaways AI adoption alone does not prove ROI. Teams must measure how AI coding tools impact development speed, software quality, engineering capacity, and overall costs. Developer time saved must translate into business value. Tracking recovered hours,...